Comments on: Status update: Tab matches in Awesomebar, Extension Manager UI http://theunfocused.net/2010/01/25/status-update-19/ And Other Unfocused Things Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: dria http://theunfocused.net/2010/01/25/status-update-19/#comment-6404 dria Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:51:33 +0000 http://theunfocused.net/?p=374#comment-6404 Oh I see, yeah. Not terribly discoverable, no, but very powerful. Oh I see, yeah. Not terribly discoverable, no, but very powerful.

]]> By: Blair McBride http://theunfocused.net/2010/01/25/status-update-19/#comment-6403 Blair McBride Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:26:36 +0000 http://theunfocused.net/?p=374#comment-6403 Yes, but that doesn't really matter. Restrict characters (such as * to restrict results to only bookmarks, + to only tagged bookmarks, etc) only work if they're the first character in the URLbar input. So inputting "foo%20bar" will just do a normal awesomebar query. It's not until you input something like "% foo" that it will restrict the results to only tab matches. (And yes, I realize how horribly undiscoverable that is.) Yes, but that doesn’t really matter. Restrict characters (such as * to restrict results to only bookmarks, + to only tagged bookmarks, etc) only work if they’re the first character in the URLbar input. So inputting “foo%20bar” will just do a normal awesomebar query. It’s not until you input something like “% foo” that it will restrict the results to only tab matches.

(And yes, I realize how horribly undiscoverable that is.)

]]> By: dria http://theunfocused.net/2010/01/25/status-update-19/#comment-6401 dria Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:11:12 +0000 http://theunfocused.net/?p=374#comment-6401 Isn't "%" used in URLs already? Isn’t “%” used in URLs already?

]]>