<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How web services punish you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theunfocused.net/2008/10/11/how-web-services-punish-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theunfocused.net/2008/10/11/how-web-services-punish-you/</link>
	<description>And Other Unfocused Things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:25:33 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sky</title>
		<link>http://theunfocused.net/2008/10/11/how-web-services-punish-you/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theunfocused.net/?p=65#comment-20</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re describing a UI that forces a user to copy and paste a key to another service, then that&#039;s stupid, because it&#039;s easy enough to make a protocol that handshakes between the services after the user&#039;s permission.

But getting the user&#039;s permission per-application isn&#039;t stupid at all.  unless ZERO information is being shared with the other service (including username), then I&#039;d prefer the web service verify that I want that information shared (if I haven&#039;t marked it public).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re describing a UI that forces a user to copy and paste a key to another service, then that&#8217;s stupid, because it&#8217;s easy enough to make a protocol that handshakes between the services after the user&#8217;s permission.</p>
<p>But getting the user&#8217;s permission per-application isn&#8217;t stupid at all.  unless ZERO information is being shared with the other service (including username), then I&#8217;d prefer the web service verify that I want that information shared (if I haven&#8217;t marked it public).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
